Nottingham ForestvSunderland
Sun, 25 Apr 2027, 12:00 am AEST
The City Ground
Season comparison
| Nottingham Forest | 2026-27 | Sunderland |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Played | 3 |
| 0 | Won | 1 |
| 2 | Drawn | 1 |
| 1 | Lost | 1 |
| 2 | Goals for | 3 |
| 3 | Goals against | 3 |
| DDL | Last 5 | DWL |
Key stats
- 0.5Half-time goals0.5
Half-time goals: Nottingham Forest 0.5, Sunderland 0.5. The score at the break.
- 1.46xG1.63
xG: Nottingham Forest 1.46, Sunderland 1.63. Chances created, each weighted by how often a shot like it is scored.
- 1.20Non-penalty xG1.38
Non-penalty xG: Nottingham Forest 1.20, Sunderland 1.38. The same with penalties taken out — open-play threat only.
- 12Shots12.3
Shots: Nottingham Forest 12, Sunderland 12.3. Attempts at goal, on target or not.
- 2.3On target4.3
On target: Nottingham Forest 2.3, Sunderland 4.3. Goals plus saved shots. A shot against the post is not on target.
- 0.7Big chances2
Big chances: Nottingham Forest 0.7, Sunderland 2. Shots worth 0.3 expected goals or more — the ones that should be scored.
- 4Corners4
Corners: Nottingham Forest 4, Sunderland 4. Corners won.
- 2Shots from corners1.7
Shots from corners: Nottingham Forest 2, Sunderland 1.7. How many of those corners actually produced a shot.
- 0.3From free kicks1
From free kicks: Nottingham Forest 0.3, Sunderland 1. Shots struck directly from a free kick.
- 2.3Headed shots2.7
Headed shots: Nottingham Forest 2.3, Sunderland 2.7. Attempts with the head, a proxy for how much arrives from crosses.
- 0.3Penalties0.3
Penalties: Nottingham Forest 0.3, Sunderland 0.3. Penalties awarded and taken.
- 169.3Passes in their third254
Passes in their third: Nottingham Forest 169.3, Sunderland 254. Passes completed in the opposition’s defensive third. NOT total passes — no source here publishes those.
- 6Deep completions8
Deep completions: Nottingham Forest 6, Sunderland 8. Passes completed within 20 yards of goal.
- 12.5Fouls12
Fouls: Nottingham Forest 12.5, Sunderland 12. Fouls conceded.
- 2.3Yellow cards1.7
Yellow cards: Nottingham Forest 2.3, Sunderland 1.7. Summed from the players.
- 12.6PPDA9.9
PPDA: Nottingham Forest 12.6, Sunderland 9.9. Passes the opposition completes per defensive action. A LOW number means pressing high and often; a high one means sitting off.
- 1.60Expected points1.54
Expected points: Nottingham Forest 1.60, Sunderland 1.54. Points these chances were worth on average — 3 for a win, 1 for a draw — whatever the scoreline actually said.
Head to head
Last time out
Nottingham Forest
Nottingham Forest 0–0 Tottenham Hotspur · 5 Sept
- James McAteeMC
- Dan NdoyeAMC
- Liam DelapFW
- Matz SelsGK
- Nikola MilenkovićDC
- JairDC
- MurilloDC
- Ola AinaDMR
- Neco WilliamsDML
- Xaver SchlagerMC
- Gibbs-WhiteAMC
Substitutes used (4)
Sunderland
Brentford 1–1 Sunderland · 5 Sept
- Robin RoefsGK
- Nordi MukieleDR
- Kevin DansoDC
- ReinildoDL
- Noah SadikiDMC
- Granit XhakaDMC
- Thomas MeunierAMR
- Enzo Le FéeAMC
- Nilson AnguloAML
- Brian BrobbeyFW
- Daniel BallardDC
Substitutes used (3)
Players to watch
Nottingham Forest
- Dan Ndoye1Goals
- Gibbs-White1Assists
- Gibbs-White7Shots
- Igor Jesus2Shots on target
- James McAtee9Key passes
- Igor Jesus1Big chances
- Gibbs-White1.34Expected goals
- Dan Ndoye0.94Expected assists
Sunderland
- Wilson Isidor1Goals
- Habib Diarra1Assists
- Enzo Le Fée7Shots
- Noah Sadiki2Shots on target
- Granit Xhaka8Key passes
- Wilson Isidor2Big chances
- Wilson Isidor1.11Expected goals
- Trai Hume0.82Expected assists
Defence vs position
2026-27 season. Only 3 matches behind the thinner of the two clubs, so read the ranks as an early indication rather than a record.
| Forwards | Nottingham Forest v Sunderland def | Sunderland v Nottingham Forest def |
|---|---|---|
| Goals | 0.00v0.3310th/5th | 0.00v0.3310th/5th |
| Assists | 0.00v0.007th/8th | 0.00v0.007th/8th |
| Shots | 2.7v2.77th/7th | 2.0v3.010th/5th |
| Shots on target | 0.7v1.07th/5th | 0.0v0.318th/13th |
| Key passes | 1.3v0.72nd/13th | 1.0v0.37th/18th |
| Big chances | 0.33v1.0010th/1st | 0.33v0.6710th/5th |
| xG | 0.48v0.5410th/5th | 0.29v0.4711th/8th |
| Attacking mid | Nottingham Forest v Sunderland def | Sunderland v Nottingham Forest def |
|---|---|---|
| Goals | 0.67v0.007th/19th | 0.67v0.337th/9th |
| Assists | 0.33v0.336th/8th | 0.00v0.6712th/4th |
| Shots | 3.3v2.715th/19th | 4.0v2.714th/19th |
| Shots on target | 0.7v0.016th/20th | 1.0v1.014th/16th |
| Key passes | 1.0v2.719th/15th | 2.0v2.716th/15th |
| Big chances | 0.33v0.3313th/12th | 0.67v0.008th/18th |
| xG | 0.66v0.409th/15th | 0.52v0.1411th/20th |
| Midfielders | Nottingham Forest v Sunderland def | Sunderland v Nottingham Forest def |
|---|---|---|
| Goals | 0.00v0.339th/3rd | 0.00v0.339th/3rd |
| Assists | 0.00v0.3310th/3rd | 0.00v0.0010th/11th |
| Shots | 3.7v2.34th/11th | 2.0v2.311th/11th |
| Shots on target | 0.7v0.37th/10th | 0.7v0.37th/10th |
| Key passes | 5.7v1.71st/15th | 3.7v1.74th/15th |
| Big chances | 0.00v0.339th/3rd | 0.33v0.005th/9th |
| xG | 0.24v0.209th/9th | 0.31v0.087th/16th |
| Defenders | Nottingham Forest v Sunderland def | Sunderland v Nottingham Forest def |
|---|---|---|
| Goals | 0.00v0.007th/5th | 0.00v0.007th/5th |
| Assists | 0.00v0.008th/10th | 0.00v0.008th/10th |
| Shots | 2.0v1.39th/14th | 2.0v3.39th/4th |
| Shots on target | 0.0v0.017th/16th | 0.7v0.36th/11th |
| Key passes | 0.7v2.019th/7th | 1.7v2.712th/5th |
| Big chances | 0.00v0.339th/6th | 0.00v0.339th/6th |
| xG | 0.13v0.1511th/11th | 0.05v0.3218th/5th |
Each cell is what that club’s forwards in that position produce per match, against what the opposition concedes to that position — and the two ranks beneath them, out of 20. First rank 1 produces the most; second rank 1 concedes the most. So a low pair is a good attack meeting a soft defence, which is the matchup worth finding. A substitute counts towards the position he usually starts in, because the source names a position only for players who start and substitutes are a fourteenth of this league’s goals.
Odds
No prices yet
No bookmaker on our list has priced this fixture. Odds appear once a market opens, which for most fixtures is the week of the game.