Manchester City3–0West Ham United

xG: Manchester City 3.00, West Ham United 0.49. Chances created, each weighted by how often a shot like it is scored.

Non-penalty xG: Manchester City 3.00, West Ham United 0.49. The same with penalties taken out — open-play threat only.

Shots: Manchester City 16, West Ham United 6. Attempts at goal, on target or not.

On target: Manchester City 7, West Ham United 2. Goals plus saved shots. A shot against the post is not on target.

Big chances: Manchester City 5, West Ham United 0. Shots worth 0.3 expected goals or more — the ones that should be scored.

Corners: Manchester City 6, West Ham United 3. Corners won.

Shots from corners: Manchester City 3, West Ham United 0. How many of those corners actually produced a shot.

Headed shots: Manchester City 3, West Ham United 0. Attempts with the head, a proxy for how much arrives from crosses.

Passes in their third: Manchester City 393, West Ham United 164. Passes completed in the opposition’s defensive third. NOT total passes — no source here publishes those.

Deep completions: Manchester City 15, West Ham United 2. Passes completed within 20 yards of goal.

Fouls: Manchester City 8, West Ham United 8. Fouls conceded.

Yellow cards: Manchester City 0, West Ham United 1. Summed from the players.

PPDA: Manchester City 6.8, West Ham United 32.8. Passes the opposition completes per defensive action. A LOW number means pressing high and often; a high one means sitting off.

Expected points: Manchester City 2.81, West Ham United 0.12. Points these chances were worth on average — 3 for a win, 1 for a draw — whatever the scoreline actually said.