West Ham United2–1Wolverhampton Wanderers

xG: West Ham United 1.20, Wolverhampton Wanderers 1.48. Chances created, each weighted by how often a shot like it is scored.

Non-penalty xG: West Ham United 1.20, Wolverhampton Wanderers 1.48. The same with penalties taken out — open-play threat only.

Shots: West Ham United 19, Wolverhampton Wanderers 19. Attempts at goal, on target or not.

On target: West Ham United 4, Wolverhampton Wanderers 5. Goals plus saved shots. A shot against the post is not on target.

Big chances: West Ham United 1, Wolverhampton Wanderers 2. Shots worth 0.3 expected goals or more — the ones that should be scored.

Corners: West Ham United 11, Wolverhampton Wanderers 0. Corners won.

Shots from corners: West Ham United 5, Wolverhampton Wanderers 0. How many of those corners actually produced a shot.

Headed shots: West Ham United 6, Wolverhampton Wanderers 2. Attempts with the head, a proxy for how much arrives from crosses.

Passes in their third: West Ham United 217, Wolverhampton Wanderers 208. Passes completed in the opposition’s defensive third. NOT total passes — no source here publishes those.

Deep completions: West Ham United 7, Wolverhampton Wanderers 6. Passes completed within 20 yards of goal.

Fouls: West Ham United 12, Wolverhampton Wanderers 17. Fouls conceded.

Yellow cards: West Ham United 5, Wolverhampton Wanderers 4. Summed from the players.

PPDA: West Ham United 9.0, Wolverhampton Wanderers 8.0. Passes the opposition completes per defensive action. A LOW number means pressing high and often; a high one means sitting off.

Expected points: West Ham United 1.15, Wolverhampton Wanderers 1.58. Points these chances were worth on average — 3 for a win, 1 for a draw — whatever the scoreline actually said.